A me-too brand is one that imitates the leading brand in a category, expecting consumers to quickly recognize its attributes. Although this is consistent with a categorization process, the me-too brand should not cause consumer confusion. This study evaluates consumer confusion because of: a) the presence of a leading brand next to a me-too brand, and b) the presence of the brand name on the package. This experimental design includes six categories of snacks (chocolate covered cakes, waffle cookies, chocolate chip cookies, crackers, lollipops, and gummy candy), for each of which we estimate three logit models to determine the probability of occurrence of: a) making an unexpected choice; b) consumer awareness; and c) consumer confusion (a and b simultaneously). The results show that the three measures of consumer confusion are complementary with each other. The results also confirm that consumer confusion may be prevented by having the leading brand next to the me-too brand on the shelf and by assuring visibility of the brand name on their packaging. The findings concern managers and policy makers who should be aware of the benefits and constraints of using the me-too strategy. This study elaborates on the theoretical and operational definition of consumer confusion by considering its cognitive and behavioral dimensions.