This article is aimed at viewing the evidence in the legal and political debate. A field relatively little addressed in the expert literature. We relying on the philosophy of science and a little less in legal theory, note that explanations of inductive framework of legal and political knowledge and arguments about evidence and proof, are based on probabilistic connections and falsifiable assumptions and not honored meta theoretical speculations. The support base to represent the legal debate - Political now has solid components of formal logic and empirical research.
